Wednesday, June 5, 2024

Momentum Builds to Abolish the Local Property Tax

Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

Local real estate taxes are the primary funding method used by municipalities in the United States. According to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, 75% of the $800 billion raised annually to support local government spending comes from property taxes. 


The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis put the total value of raised state and local property taxes in the U.S. at a little over $12 billion in 2023. The graph below shows how this amount grew over time and nearly doubled since the mid-2000s. The Tax Policy Center notes that localities generally levy taxes on real estate and states are more apt to tax only personal property, such as business equipment and furnishings in second homes.



The increasing burden on real estate property owners has spurred some states to consider abolishing property taxes. This is an interesting concept that begs the question: where will the funding for local government come from?


But first, a little history about property taxes.


A Tax Owed to Landlords and Kings


Property taxes were levied by kings in ancient Babylon, China, and Egypt, as well as other countries and city-states where land was taxed according to its production value. During feudal times, William the Conqueror instituted a land tax system whereby a list of property owners was kept in a book along with the land’s assessed value and the amount of tax due.


Until the 19th century, taxation schemes were disorganized and widely considered inequitable. States began the move toward uniformity, and the real property tax was seen as a realistic way for rural areas to raise money.


The 20th century saw growing discontent with property taxation methods. In some states, a mix of government entities and special districts would tax the same parcel multiple times. 


Reform efforts introduced the concept of exemptions, property classifications, and training for tax assessors. The economic expansion following World War II brought higher real estate prices, values, and tax bills. The property tax revolts of the 1970s led to the passage of Proposition 13 in California and Proposition 2 ½ in Massachusetts, both measures intended to put the brakes on escalating property taxes.


Where the Real Property Tax is Under Attack


Rapidly rising real estate prices and values have renewed the anti-tax vigor of the 1970s. Several states are considering eradicating property taxes but are finding it difficult to replace the revenue adequately.


Texas


Governor Greg Abbott has made it clear that he supports abolishing the local property tax. Last summer, Abbott signed a bill to cut local taxes by $18 billion. In November, voters approved a constitutional amendment, known as Proposition 4, to increase the state’s homestead exemption and restructure how schools are funded. Essentially, surplus state funds were used to supplement school maintenance and operations budgets, thus reducing the amount needed from property taxes.


North Dakota


In 2012, voters failed to pass a ballot question to end local property taxation. In July 2023, a group spearheaded by former state legislator Rick Becker began circulating a similar petition that, by January of this year, garnered a little more than half the signatures needed to be placed on the November ballot.


Becker claims that the lost revenue of $1+ billion would be replaced by “legacy fund earnings and operation prairie dog funds”, plus ending wasteful spending.


Florida


House Bill 1371, first filed on January 5, 2024, would have increased the homestead exemption for property owners under the age of 65 to $100,000  and for homeowners over the age of 65 to $250,000. The bill would also have required a study of the impact of replacing the real property tax with a new consumption tax.


A new filing on February 1 left only the language regarding an impact study intact; on March 8, the bill died a quiet death in the State Affairs Committee.


Michigan


An initiative seeking a place on the November ballot calls for the Michigan property tax to be voluntary for all services but police, fire, and road commissions. Whether or not the petition is placed before voters, the subject has elicited fiery debate between property owners on both sides of the question.


Addressing Calls for Property Tax Relief


So far, no state has eliminated the local property tax since no comprehensive plan replaces the revenue. Raising or instituting consumption taxes has been floated as a solution, though such revenues would be harder to predict than taxes on a stable tax base like real estate.


Escalating demands for relief have resulted in legislative actions to address the problem, primarily by using Covid-related relief funds to subsidize property tax revenues. With those funds drying up, some states, like Colorado, have passed bills to limit assessed valuations for tax purposes while other states, like Georgia, will put constitutional amendments limiting assessed values on the November ballot for voter approval.


With home prices continuing to rise, the momentum to reign in property taxes is not likely to slow. CoreLogic’s May 2024 report notes a 5.3% increase in home prices from March 2023 to March 2024, higher than its year-ago prediction of a 4.6% price increase–with Northeastern states leading the way. 


Massachusetts has one of the highest median home sale prices in the country. This chart from Rocket Homes, published May 8, shows our fair state sporting a median price of $571,436, with only California, Washington, D.C., and Hawaii commanding higher median prices. On May 24, The Mortgage Reports pegs Massachusetts’ median price at $622,639, nearly tied with Colorado and trailing California, Hawaii, Washington, D.C., and Washington state.


Notably, property owners in the Northeast have not joined in the current tax revolt. If home prices and values soar, that could change.










Tuesday, May 21, 2024

New Shutesbury Library Project Goes Out to Bid



Without fanfare or public announcement, Shutesbury’s new library bid solicitation went out on April 24, 2024. 


It was easy to miss. Because I subscribe to meeting notices through our town’s website, I received a notice for the Library Building Committee’s (LBC) June 6 meeting where they plan to “Review construction bids”. 


On May 8 I contacted the Chair of the Shutesbury Library Building Committee for details. She said the bid was submitted to Projectdog.com  on April 24. I also asked about the well water tests, to which she replied that they have received preliminary results and are waiting for final testing results. Despite requests for this information, the preliminary results have not been made public.


Projectdog requires creating an account to view information. Unable to find the project, I asked the Chair for the project code, which she gave me (861574). In the same email, I also suggested the Committee post the bid documents on the town website but received no response.


The Library Director sent a town-wide “Library News” email on May 16 with an announcement regarding the library project bid.


Bid Solicitation Highlights


As you may imagine, there were many documents uploaded for this bid, including forms, plans, and blueprints. Here are a few details to inform our understanding of where the library project now stands.


The estimated construction cost is $6 million. Recalling that a recent LBC meeting revealed a $6+ million price estimate for the 75% complete construction documents, I forwarded another question to the LBC chair. She reminded me that the $6 million is only the construction cost, not the entire project's cost. She also noted that value engineering (cost-cutting) had been done before sending out the bid.


Shutesbury has requested a base bid, with add alternates available if the base bid comes in under the cost estimate amount.


The original general contractor and subcontractor bid submission dates were May 30 and May 15, respectively. These dates have changed and may change again.


Addendum No. 1, filed on May 1, answered 7 questions from contractors. This 283-page addendum made substantive changes to the bid package, advising bidders that it “modifies, amends, and supplements designated parts of the Contract Documents” for the project.


Addendum No. 2, filed on May 6, answered 17 questions from contractors.  This addendum also made substantial changes and contains 75 pages.


Addendum No. 3, filed on May 10, answered 23 questions from contractors.  This document also extended the following dates:

  • Subcontractors' bid deadline: May 23;

  • General contractors’ question deadline: May 28;

  • General contractors’ bid deadline: June 4.


Addendum No. 4, filed May 15, answered 30 questions from contractors. This document contains 76 pages. 


Addendum No. 5, filed May 17, answered 15 questions from contractors, and corrected answers provided to two previous questions in Addendum No. 4. There are multiple revisions, additions, and deletions to the original bid. This document contains 63 pages.


One of the revised answers in Addendum No. 5 pertains to the wood products used in this project. The new answer, with additional text bolded and underlined (per Addendum No. 5), now reads:


Wood materials for this project are not required to be obtained from forests certified by an FSC-accredited certification body to comply with FSC’s "Principles and Criteria for Forest Stewardship". All specification requirements will not need to be verified during submittal review.


This change surprised me since Shutesbury has been clear about wanting the building to be as environmentally responsible as possible, as is apparent in the LBC’s discussions on Net Zero and solar. All MA state-owned forests have been certified since 2004.


NOTE: All addenda documents include the list of bidders’ questions.


How Does Shutesbury’s Bid Experience Compare with Similar Projects?


I found the number of bidder inquiries and, importantly, the amount of revision done to the bid documents particularly interesting. Wondering if the number of questions from bidders and the scope of revisions was commonplace, I  compared Shutesbury’s bid with Amherst’s two recent library projects: the North Amherst Library addition and renovation, and the Jones Library renovation and addition. Both projects have readily available public information and have been extensively covered by the local media.


A recent article on the Amherst Indy expressed concern over the number of bidder inquiries as well as the voluminous addenda submitted by the Town of Amherst in response. For a $35.5 million contract, there were 98 questions and 22 answering addenda, totaling approximately 1,100 pages in addition to the original 3,400 in the bid solicitation.


By comparison, the bid documents for the North Amherst Library Addition project, originally estimated at $1.25 million, comprised the original bid document of 70 pages, plus six addenda. The N. Amherst, Jones, and Shutesbury library projects are compared in the table below.



Project

Project Cost (Original)

# of Bid Docs 

Bidder Questions

# of Addenda

# of Addenda Pages

# of Bid Extensions

N. Amherst Library Addition

$1.25M

70

88

6

55

1

Shutesbury Library

$6M

130

94

5

551

1

Jones Library Renovation/Addition

$35.5M

3,400

98

22

1,100

3

 


Project variables such as size, cost, and complexity will directly impact the number of bidder questions and the issuance of addenda.


The Biggest Headwind for Local Library Projects: Price


Shutesbury is in a challenging bidding environment. Recent experiences in Amherst and Deerfield demonstrate the difficulty faced by local library projects, as each town received only a single bid for their respective projects.


Faced with a single bid for the Jones Library project that came in at $7 million above expectations, Amherst took stock of its situation. At a Special Meeting of the Amherst Town Council on April 29, the fate of the project was discussed. The general sentiment favored abandoning the new addition and concentrating on repairing and renovating the Jones Library building.


On May 3, the Trustees of the Jones Library unanimously recommended to the Town Manager to reject all general and subcontractor bids, which totaled $55 million. The Manager has until June 10 to decide whether to accept or reject the bids.


Deerfield's Tilton Library Expansion received only one bid, for $10.99 million, exceeding their estimate. Despite the disappointment, the town decided to award the project, stating that there "should be no budgetary issues" after making several adjustments. Deerfield accepted only the base bid.


The Tilton’s Project Manager noted that receiving only one higher-than-expected bid is not unusual for Pioneer Valley projects. Last June, Shutesbury’s architects warned the Library Building Committee that bids for our project will likely be higher because:


  • Contractors are busy, which translates into fewer, higher bids;

  • This is a small project with no economy of scale;

  • Shutesbury is not close to an urban area.


At the time of publication of this post, bids are due by June 4. As long as there are no more deadline extensions, all will be revealed soon.




Tuesday, May 7, 2024

Information Mining on Shutesbury.org

Photo by Kenny Eliason on Unsplash

Municipal websites provide a wealth of information for citizens willing to explore what they offer. Though not all local governments display all the data the Massachusetts Public Records Law requires, they contain plenty of useful information that residents can access from their favorite web-connected devices.


Shutesbury’s website is no exception. Some information is easy to find and some requires a bit of digging. I’ve spent a fair amount of time over the past few years researching what Shutesbury.org offers, which is quite a lot. Other Shutesbury residents have also generously shared their knowledge.


Here's a quick tour of Shutesbury's website, from the basics to the more obscure, starting with its homepage.

Homepage


The landing page for Shutesbury.org contains answers to commonly asked questions and links to job postings, information about hazardous waste releases in town, and recycling and trash information, among other things.


The link to the town “Calendar” page displays several weeks’ worth of planned meetings and a link to “MyTownGovernment”, a private site that allows information-seekers to sign up for email alerts regarding upcoming meetings. Residents can sign up for as few or as many board and committee meetings as they like. I learned of this service a few years ago and can attest to its utility. 



In addition to listings and alerts for town government meetings, MyTownGovernment lists meetings and agendas for outside agencies, such as the Union 28 School District. The site also allows access to minutes, documents used during a particular meeting, and past meeting listings including their agendas.


On the right-hand side of the homepage and below the heading "Contact Town Officials", are two important sign-up links. One is for the Town Announcement emails, and the other is for Code Red, the town's emergency alert system. Both of these notification systems are extremely useful as they provide valuable information about power outages and other weather-related problems. They also provide updates on road projects and any associated issues. Furthermore, they inform you of any disruptions in the trash and recycling pickup schedule, usually due to trash truck breakdowns. 


At the top of every page on Shutesbury.org is a list of options with dropdown lists. Here are some highlights.

Departments


Assessors: Lots of information and links to explore concerning taxes, tax rates, town real estate values, exemptions, property cards, and Geographic Information System data. 


Dog Officer: Pertinent information about licensing dogs and the Shutesbury Leash Law (yes, we have one).


Police Department: There are links to the “Shutesbury Police Core Values” page, and to police logs, by year. The police logs page is disappointing as there is very little current information, with only one month’s worth of logs from 2023 and nothing from 2024. 


Town Clerk: As you would expect, this page has tons of information and links regarding important issues such as voting, town meetings, policies relating to public officials, the Open Meeting Law, the Public Records Law, and much more. 

Meetings


Under this heading, you’ll find links to posted meeting minutes of all boards and committees, links to the meeting Calendars page, and the link to Shutesbury’s YouTube channel, where Zoom meeting recordings are posted.

Services


I strongly recommend you peruse each of these pages as they all have pertinent information for residents and describe much of what our taxes pay for. 


Emergency Management: This page has information about and links to CodeRed and Shutesbury’s Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan. NOTE: Though not a part of our town website, I recently found this MA Emergency Management Agency page for power outages, making tracking power restoration in town quick and easy.


Our Town Newsletter: This local news publication sports an end page that lists contact information for town officials–a low-tech reference item that we cut out now and then and tape to the inside of one of the kitchen cabinets. The most recent issue has an insert about creating a “Peace of Mind Binder” that is a real gem.


ShutesburyNET: Loads of information about our popular town broadband service and the perfect place to start if you have questions or concerns.


A few pages contain referral links to other websites, such as the Library, Housing Rehabilitation, Schools, Social and Community Services, and Veterans’ Services.

Town Governance


Interesting topics include links to Annual Reports from 2016 to 2022, Town Bylaws, Town Policies and Guidelines, and a handy Town Organizational Chart.

Town Officials


In addition to listing all Appointed and Elected town officials and their contact information, this tab also shares helpful information and links regarding Legislators and State Offices.


If you’d rather not have to mouse over headings to see the subheadings, clicking on the Site Index at the bottom of any webpage will show you the options in a single-page layout.

Search Tips & Tricks



Like many websites, Shutesbury.org’s search engine is less than robust. I’ve found it helps to be creative when searching the site.


Let’s take an example. I typed “finance” into the white search box and got 14 pages of results. Most were Finance Committee minutes, meaning the search engine grabbed the word “finance” and returned those results. Fair enough, but on page 14 I noticed a “Food Resources” page that did not contain the word “finance”.  This page has good information but seems inaccessible unless you search for “food resources”. It seems like a good fit for inclusion under the “Services” tab but is not listed there.


Similarly, searching for “budgets” does not return pages containing the town’s fiscal year budgets. Clicking the “Finances” link under the Town Governance tab brings up the Finance Committee’s page, which includes a link to several years’ worth of annual town budgets using the vague anchor text, “to be voted at the Annual Town Meeting--which, in turn, brings you to the Town Meeting page.


I’ve noticed the presence of various nodes on the website, many of which do not seem connected to other website content. These nodes often present items of interest such as committee reports, election results, and, occasionally, bid requests.


Fortunately, the Shutesbury town website also has a Google Programmable Search Engine that crawls the entire site to return more targeted results. Happily, this service is free for non-profit sites


To find all the nodes on the site, simply enter your search query in the “Enhanced by Google” search box. The search engine will display all the relevant nodes on Shutesbury.org, and you can browse through the multi-page search results.


The Google Programmable Search is particularly useful for researching a specific event, document, issue, or concern since it searches all documents on Shutesbury.org, including minutes.


Give Shutesbury.org a test drive and let the Web Communications Committee know if you have any questions, ideas for better site navigation, or suggestions for new or expanded content. They are there to help.



The True Cost of the Standard American Diet (SAD)

Photo by Jo Sonn on Unsplash Would you describe your diet as “healthy”? If you answered “yes”, you may have overestimated the healthfulness...